Skip to content

Abstract


This paper argues incumbent firms may acquire innovative targets solely to discontinue the target’s innovation projects and preempt future competition. We call such acquisitions “killer acquisitions.” We develop a parsimonious model illustrating this phenomenon. Using pharmaceutical industry data, we show that acquired drug projects are less likely to be developed when they overlap with the acquirer’s existing product portfolio, especially when the acquirer’s market power is large due to weak competition or distant patent expiration. Conservative estimates indicate about 6% of acquisitions in our sample are killer acquisitions. These acquisitions disproportionately occur just below thresholds for antitrust scrutiny.

Related

ASSA 2026 Round-up: Day 3
Policy

ASSA 2026 Round-up: Day 3

Blog JAN 6, 2026

By: Equitable Growth

AI, Tech & Energy Competition & Economic Dynamism Economic Equity & Opportunity Labor, Wages & Worker Power Macroeconomics & Economic Measurement Taxation
ASSA 2026 Round-up: Day 2
Policy

ASSA 2026 Round-up: Day 2

Blog JAN 5, 2026

By: Equitable Growth

AI, Tech & Energy Competition & Economic Dynamism Economic Equity & Opportunity Household Economic Security Labor, Wages & Worker Power Macroeconomics & Economic Measurement Taxation

Your Direct Line to Cutting-Edge Research

Get updates on our latest research, event announcements, and policy insights delivered straight to your inbox. Stay connected with the leading voices on equitable growth.