Skip to content
Browse All Resources
Essays

MAR 19, 2021

Weekend reading: Expanding Unemployment Insurance coverage benefits workers and boosts the economy edition

Weekend reading: Why stable schedules matter edition

Abstract

This is a post we publish each Friday with links to articles that touch on economic inequality and growth. The first section is a round-up of what Equitable Growth published this week and the second is relevant and interesting articles we’re highlighting from elsewhere. We won’t be the first to share these articles, but we hope by taking a look back at the whole week, we can put them in context.

Equitable Growth round-up

Unemployment Insurance is a vital resource for U.S. workers who lose their jobs through no fault of their own, but those who voluntarily leave their jobs typically are not eligible to receive UI benefits. This complicates job searches for married dual-earner couples. Studies show they tend to move to pursue job opportunities less often than single-earner households, partly because of the challenges involved in moving two jobs as opposed to one. When married couples do move, one spouse frequently becomes the so-called trailing spouse, leaving their job behind and usually facing earnings penalties and lower labor force participation rates as a result. A new working paper by Joanna Venator looks at the impact of Unemployment Insurance for trailing spouses—a program enacted in 23 states, as of 2017—which allows trailing spouses to apply for and receive Unemployment Insurance from the state in which the couple worked prior to moving. Venator explains in a column that her research finds access to this income support program increases the likelihood that a dual-earner household will move and improves married women’s labor market outcomes after a move, in part because women become the trailing spouse more often than men. In fact, she writes, married women who are able to claim the trailing spouses benefit receive higher annual earnings 3 years after moving of between $4,500 and $12,000, compared to similar women who are not eligible for these benefits. Venator details the policy implications in terms of the design of UI systems and policies meant to encourage moving for work opportunities.

Head over to Brad DeLong’s latest Worthy Reads column (opens in a new tab) to get his takes on recent Equitable Growth content and other items from around the web.

Related

Your Direct Line to Cutting-Edge Research

Get updates on our latest research, event announcements, and policy insights delivered straight to your inbox. Stay connected with the leading voices on equitable growth.