Skip to content
Browse All Resources
Essays

DEC 9, 2016

Weekend reading: “Distributional national accounts and declining mobility” edition

Weekend reading: the fiscal multipliers, childcare, and maximum employment edition

Abstract

This is a weekly post we publish on Fridays with links to articles that touch on economic inequality and growth. The first section is a round-up of what Equitable Growth published this week and the second is the work we’re highlighting from elsewhere. We won’t be the first to share these articles, but we hope by taking a look back at the whole week, we can put them in context.

Equitable Growth round-up

Did minimum wage increases during the Great Recession reduce employment for low-wage workers? A new paper by Ben Zipperer at the Economic Policy Institute argues that they did not and previous studies looking at this question have a flawed research design.

Economists Thomas Piketty, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman released new groundbreaking data on income trends in the United States. This new dataset, the Distributional National Accounts, allows researchers to look at trends in both pre-tax and post-tax incomes.

Heather Boushey argues that the Distributional National Accounts could do for our understanding of economic growth in the 21st century what the National Income and Product Accounts—the source of GDP—did for the 20th century.

The U.S. labor market is on its way toward full employment. But how close is it? A look at new data on quitting, job openings, and hiring gives some more information on how much stronger the labor market can get.

New research by a team of researchers from Stanford University, Harvard University, and the University of California-Berkeley shows a precipitous decline in U.S. income mobility. The authors summarize their results for Equitable Growth.

This research also shows something interesting about the relationship between U.S. absolute and relative mobility. Income growth was so strong and broad-based from 1940 to 1970 that the amount of relative mobility didn’t matter: Absolute mobility was going to be very high.

Friday figure

Figure from “How tight is the U.S. labor market? And how tight do we want it?” by Nick Bunker

Related

Your Direct Line to Cutting-Edge Research

Get updates on our latest research, event announcements, and policy insights delivered straight to your inbox. Stay connected with the leading voices on equitable growth.