Skip to content
Browse All Resources
Essays

JUN 25, 2021

Weekend reading: Announcing Equitable Growth’s new president and CEO edition

Weekend reading: Why stable schedules matter edition

Abstract

This is a post we publish each Friday with links to articles that touch on economic inequality and growth. The first section is a round-up of what Equitable Growth published this week and the second is relevant and interesting articles we’re highlighting from elsewhere. We won’t be the first to share these articles, but we hope by taking a look back at the whole week, we can put them in context.

Equitable Growth round-up

In long-awaited and very exciting news, Equitable Growth this week announced that Michelle Holder will be our next president and CEO. Holder is currently an assistant professor (opens in a new tab) of economics at John Jay College, City University of New York, whose research focuses on the Black community and women of color in the U.S. labor market. Named one of 19 Black economists to watch by Fortune magazine (opens in a new tab) in June 2020, Holder has authored two books, including African American Men and the Labor Market during the Great Recession (opens in a new tab) in 2017 and most recently, Afro-Latinos in the U.S. Economy (opens in a new tab), published in May 2021. Earlier this month, Holder testified before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee for a hearing titled “The Gender Wage Gap: Breaking Through Stalled Progress (opens in a new tab),” and she was a featured speaker at the Black Women’s Economic Liberation Summit (opens in a new tab). Holder will officially start as Equitable Growth’s president and CEO in September.

A new working paper examines the role of slavery in U.S. economic growth and development in the two decades prior to the Civil War. In a column summarizing the research, Kathryn Zickuhr writes that this study provides the first in-depth estimate of the contributions of enslaved Americans to economic growth, not only in the South but for the national economy as well. Zickhur details the study’s methodology, which creates more direct measures of enslaved workers’ output than have previously been used in order to accurately account for their contributions to economic growth. She then discusses the researchers’ findings: Enslaved workers were responsible for roughly one-fifth of the growth in commodity output per capita in the United States between 1839 and 1859 despite only making up 12 percent of the population in 1859. Zickhur concludes with the implications and importance of these findings, not only to better understand the role of slavery in U.S. economic history but also to contribute to discussions of reparations for the descendants of enslaved Americans and for reckoning with the legacy of the institution of slavery today.

Unemployment Insurance is a vital lifeline for many U.S. workers who have lost their jobs through no fault of their own, particularly amid the coronavirus recession, which saw mass layoffs and widespread business closures. Yet many governors now faced with labor shortages are cutting off federal pandemic emergency unemployment benefits due to unproven claims about UI benefits hampering the recovery. The UI system has long been plagued with serious issues, writes Alix Gould-Werth, but rather than abruptly ending this important worker support program, policymakers should focus on fixing it. A new report co-authored by UI policy experts offers a road map to strengthening and stabilizing Unemployment Insurance in the United States, Gould-Werth explains. The report offers ideas for developing a nationally uniform UI program with benefit levels and durations that are responsive to economic conditions and that is accessible to all members of the modern workforce who lose their jobs through no fault of their own. It also proposes a blueprint to fix the financing issues that underlie many of the problems with the UI system. These solutions would go a long way toward bolstering a program that millions of workers rely on and would help bolster the macroeconomy by maintaining demand for goods and services, keeping businesses afloat.

The U.S. economy is increasingly characterized by dominant firms controlling digital platforms, writes Steven C. Salop in a contribution to Equitable Growth’s Competitive Edge (opens in a new tab) blog series covering antitrust enforcement and competition issues. Salop discusses the legislation currently before Congress that would rein in mergers and acquisitions that tamp down competition for these monopolies and restore competition and innovation to the digital marketplace. He explains why current U.S. antitrust law makes it hard to for the antitrust enforcement agencies to successfully prevent these types of acquisitions. Salop then details why the threat of underdeterrence is more concerning than overdeterrence and why the law should mandate a strong anticompetitive presumption for acquisitions of nascent or potential competitors by dominant firms. He concludes with an explanation of how the bills before Congress would address these issues.

Geographic inequality between regions of the United States has soared over the past four decades, with a handful of metropolitan areas becoming some of the richest economic regions in world history while large swaths of the country remain trapped in economic decline. This rising interregional inequality has long been seen as an issue for local and state policymakers alone. Recently, however, there has been increasing interest in federal-level policy responses to reduce inequality between regions. Many of the ideas that have been proposed to deal with this growing inequality are place-based policies that target specific cities or neighborhoods for federal investment or subsidies. But an upcoming Equitable Growth virtual event will discuss why place-conscious policies would be more effective because they deliver support to all communities simultaneously, making them agile in the face of future changes to economic geography. Place-conscious policies also remove politically fraught questions about which areas qualify for aid and can enable the necessary structural changes to the U.S. economy that will meaningfully and sustainably address the issue of inequality in the United States. Learn more about next week’s event here.

Related

Your Direct Line to Cutting-Edge Research

Get updates on our latest research, event announcements, and policy insights delivered straight to your inbox. Stay connected with the leading voices on equitable growth.