Skip to content
Back to Newsroom

MAR 21, 2020

Weekend reading: The inequality and coronavirus edition

Weekend reading: The inequality and coronavirus edition

Overview

This is a post we publish each Friday with links to articles that touch on economic inequality and growth. The first section is a round-up of what Equitable Growth published this week and the second is relevant and interesting articles we’re highlighting from elsewhere. We won’t be the first to share these articles, but we hope by taking a look back at the whole week, we can put them in context.

Equitable Growth round-up

In news that may have gotten lost amid the NEW coronavirus outbreak, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis finally released income growth data from 2007 to 2016 separated by income quintile. The prototype—something Equitable Growth has long argued for as a means to show who is really profiting when the economy grows—shines a light on the vast inequality that persists in the U.S. economy, writes Austin Clemens. Additionally, in looking at how various income groups fared during and after the Great Recession of 2007–2009, the data can shed light on how an almost-inevitable coronavirus recession would impact the U.S. population. Clemens explains why the BEA focuses on personal income and shows how this dataset compares to similar data series, before concluding with some key takeaways.

In a joint letter to Congress, Heather Boushey and the heads of three other economic think tanks in Washington ask lawmakers to take action to “stanch the economic bleeding” caused by public health actions to contain the new coronavirus. They propose direct cash payments to American families, expanding Unemployment Insurance and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance programs, protections against eviction and measures to deal with homelessness and overcrowding in shelters, student debt relief, and financial aid to states, particularly to their health programs. They also argue for so-called automatic triggers, so that the emergency measures passed into law will not be turned off until the economy recovers from the current shocks and will automatically be switched back on in the next economic crisis. Finally, the four think-tank leaders urge Congress to prioritize benefits for small and medium-sized businesses over shareholders.

Back in January, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission released draft Vertical Merger Guidelines and requested public comment on the draft. The guidelines ignore the often-claimed and ill-supported notion that vertical mergers are inherently procompetitive, writes Jonathan Sallet, instead arguing that vertical mergers can have just as much of a dampening effect on competition as other mergers. But something called the elimination of double marginalization, or EDM, threatens to revert thinking back to the idea that vertical mergers cannot harm competition. Sallet goes through what, exactly, EDM is, why it threatens progress in this area, and why it should be treated just like any other claim of competitive benefits arising from a merger.

Your Source for the Latest Insights

Get updates on our latest research, event announcements, and policy insights delivered straight to your inbox. Stay connected with the leading voices on equitable growth.