Skip to content

Grantmaking

See the innovative research we’ve supported and discover opportunities for collaboration. Each grant represents our commitment to evidence-based solutions that promote broadly shared prosperity.

Grantmaking
Past Funding Areas
Filter by Year

Research Economic Inequality With Us

282 Results

All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$75,000

Quantifying the effects of energy transitions on the U.S. labor market and implications for the Inflation Reduction Act

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$75,000

How Do Place-Based Policies Affect People? Lessons and Implications for the Inflation Reduction Act

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$67,346

The Economic Effects of Clean Energy Manufacturing Provisions in the Inflation Reduction Act: Evidence from the Solar Supply Chain

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$70,000

IRA Subsides for EVs, Import Tariffs, and Domestic Industry

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$48,000

Competitive Implications of Generative AI Terms & Conditions: An Empirical Study

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$80,000

Tracking Generative AI Adoption at Work

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$62,149

AI in telecommunications and game development: The role of worker voice in management strategy and job quality

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$70,000

Bringing Worker Voice into the Development, Design, and Use of AI: A Case Study of the Labor Management Partnership at Kaiser Permanente

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$70,000

AI and Middle Class Mobility at the California Department of Motor Vehicles

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior
$15,000

Market Power in Homebuilding and the U.S. Housing Shortage

2025
All Academic Awards 2024 and Prior $85,000

Do Mortgage Lenders Compete Locally? Implications for Credit Access

2021

Jorring and Buchak propose to study the impact of local concentration of mortgage lenders on household credit access and homeownership. Homeownership is the primary channel through which most U.S. households build wealth. Existing literature finds little to no relationship between local lender concentration and mortgage interest rates. Therefore, federal regulators regard mortgage markets as national and view their local concentration as irrelevant to financial regulation and monetary policy. The two researchers argue that this view is incomplete, showing that although local concentration has no influence on interest rates, it strongly affects lending standards and upfront fees. In more concentrated areas, preliminary results show that lenders charge higher fees, mortgage application rejection rates are higher, and the pool of originated mortgages is less risky in terms of both credit scores and default. This may be particularly true for low-income, female, and applicants of color, suggesting that local lender concentration is particularly important when it comes to questions of credit access for traditionally underserved borrowers. Jorring and Buchak plan to combine public data from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, which covers the near universe of U.S. mortgage applications, as well as data from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on single-family loan origination and performance, with private data to explore the effects of local concentration in mortgage lending.

Research Economic Inequality With Us

We fund research examining how economic inequality affects economic growth and stability, with attention to how inequality impacts different demographic groups. We support studies that identify the causes of inequality and analyze how public policies influence the inequality-growth relationship.